Wednesday, May 04, 2005

 

Call to give 16-year-olds the vote

David Batty and agencies
Wednesday May 4, 2005


The voting age should be lowered to 16 by the next general election to prevent young people from becoming further alienated from politics, a coalition of child rights and electoral reform campaigners said today.

The coalition, which includes the Children's Rights Alliance for England (CRAE), the Electoral Reform Society, the British Youth Council and the National Union of Students, has written to the leaders of the three main parties calling on them to enfranchise Britain's 1.5 million 16 and 17-year-olds.

The Votes at 16 coalition says if 16 and 17-year-olds are able to leave home, get a full-time job, pay taxes, raise children and join the armed forces they should also be able to vote.

Louise King, policy officer at the CRAE, said: "At 16 and 17, young people's lives are as rich and varied as at any other age.

"They have considerable responsibilities and routinely make complex decisions but adult society does not consider them responsible enough to vote. This is both illogical and unjust."

The campaigners contend that swelling the number of young voters would force politicians to take their views more seriously.

So far only the Liberal Democrats have committed in their manifesto to reducing the voting age to 16. The party's spokesman for young people, Matthew Green, said: "We believe that involving young people earlier in the political process will lead to a lifetime of interest and activism.

"Sixteen is the age when they are given many other responsibilities of citizenship such as beginning full-time work and paying taxes."

Damilola Ajagbonna, 17, of the CRAE, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "It's the old revolutionaries' cry, 'no taxation without representation'. If we're not allowed to vote to decide who lowers or raises the tax, then why should we be taxed."

Mr Ajagbonna believes that lowering the voting age would also help to prevent the disillusionment with politics that an estimated two-thirds of first-time voters say has put them off voting in the current election.

He said: "To a certain degree that's partly the reason why we want to lower the voting age. Because politics is seen as this obsolete thing over there. It's them and us."

Mr Ajagbonna, who wants to be an MP, rejected claims that young people lacked sufficient knowledge and experience to vote wisely. He said the introduction of compulsory citizenship education into schools had raised the awareness of what it meant to be a good citizen.

The voting age has been reduced to 16 years in eight countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Croatia, Cuba, Nicaragua, Philippines, Serbia and Montenegro, and Slovenia.

(very interesting issue if you take into consideration that in Brazil the age was reduced some time ago and now we can clearly see the results. If you had the opportunity to give advice on this matter, what would you say?) LEO COSTA

Comments:
I DIDN'T READ ANY COMMENT ABOUT THE CHANGE HERE IN BRAZIL, BUT I BELIEVE THAT IT COULD BE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE COUNTRY'S DEVELOPING ALSO TO THE CHILD WILL LEARN TO BE A GOOD CITIZEN, BUT FOR ME IS NECESSARY TO INCLUD THE MATTER AT SCHOLL.

JULIANA VIEIRA BOOK 6
 
Hello Leo! That's interesting! That's is really important! I'm sorry I didn't come to your class again. I was taking care of my "voice problem"! Remember? Well, I'm better now... See ya in class! ;)
 
I think if in others countries the boys under or 17 have authorization to show their independency they can voting too. In Britain, they can’t subscribe contracts before reaching majority, just with 18. But in Brazil, our law should be reformulated because to join up the boys need to have 18 years old, and they need authorization from their parents to get marriage under 18. We can’t employ minor because they must go to school, and this is a crime. You go to prison.
In private, I think it isn’t advisable voting before 18. The young people first must ripen their knowledge to elect someone, because this is an important decision to our country.
 
People under 18 can't drive... but they can decide who is gonna rule the country??? I really don't understand that's decisions sometimes...
 
I’m embarrassing about my poor knowledge in this subject. I’m a kind of person that runs away when someone wants talk about politic. This is not good, I know. I’m changing my mind. Actually, I have never thought why in Brazil the vote age was lowered to 16 years old.
I read, understand and agree with this text, but I think that in Brazil is quite different. I don’t think that young people here are worried about to vote, to show their opinions. A lot of them in 16 – 18 years old don’t have any idea about politic. However, Léo has written that we can see the result of this action. So I want to ask a favor;
Léo, can you explain to me these results? Just little, I really would like to known. Which advice would you give on this matter?

Tank you!
 
I still don´t know the results about the change of age to vote here in Brazil, but I think it´s important to democracy. As I´ve seen in the text, the young people have so many obrigations and responsabilities so I think it´s correct to give them the right, not the obrigation, to vote at 16. I know our country is too diferent from England, mainly about the poverty and education but many of the changes at Brazil´s politic were made for young people, most of them going to the streets and fighting for their interests...I believe the most young vote is conscient and it´s more difficult to make up their minds about it...
 
Hi leo...Hummm, I don't know to much about this subject but I agree with Luciana...If you don't have the responsability to drive,why do you have the responsability to vote?
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?